31 October 2013
When I couldn't decide what to get someone as a gift, I would give them a new factory cassette of Velvet Underground starting with "Candy Says" which was available inexpensively at the record store. Everyone I did this for disliked the album. Everyone I know who bought the album liked it.
I had a phase where I listened to Metal Machine Music almost every day, on CD. I would make it through a record side equivalent and a half, usually. I did make it all the way through a few times. It relaxed me. "..the all-time guaranteed lease breaker. Every tenant in America should own a copy of this album... MMM is Lou's soul.. the greatest record ever made in the history of the human eardrum."
In Croatia and Bosnia before the war the information ministry hanging on to Tito's Yugoslavia played "Dirty Boulevard" over and over as anti-capitalist propaganda, everywhere you went, grocery stores, post offices. I thought "Cool. Lou."
In an interview he said "There's nothing more boring than an ex-Catholic and an ex-drunk." I was trying to quit at the time (the latter) and was far from doing so. I recall only venting about the quote to one person once. It didn't actually delay my quitting so much as Pessoa's "Your poems are of interest to mankind; your liver isn't.. Bless your poems and be damned" may have added 4-5 months to the festivities. He returns to the Catholic theme vis a vis Warhol...
on that album I learned who Valerie Solanis was in perhaps her most unflattering introduction of all.
And he never did a "Ger..i..tol..It's the life of me.." commercial.
19 October 2013
What's up
Even as Nalini Malini produced her own video of her "In Search of Vanished Blood" installation, an immersive eleven minute loop at Lelong, seeing it in person (til the 26th) is most recommended as it affords the viewer different scale and framing as well as a more varied play of images --
Malini cites as formative being a Hindu refugee from the partition of India born in Karachi, Pakistan, "Cutting the country on religious lines was terrible in itself, but more terrible because they left behind a tool for further cutting, for the right wing to do whatever they like... And under the guise of communal problems, construction companies join hands with fascists to destroy the slums, in places where everybody was living together in complete harmony. So under any excuse this thing starts up... It’s all part of the business of greed. And it’s not about the Hindu-Muslim conflict."
The tradition of shadow puppetry referenced by Malani is believed by some to date to the city of Harappa in the Pakistani side of the Punjab before the Aryan invasion in the 2nd millennium BC as well as in Bengal during that time, and has for thousands of years been used to enact the Hindu epics of the Mahabharata and Ramayana throughout India, migrating to Hindu communities in Java and Bali in Indonesia where it has retained its intensity. Miguel Covarrubias recounted in the 1930s "in Java it is a rule that the men look at the puppets while the women see only the shadows" around the time when Artaud observed during Balinese dance "the stratified, lunar eyes of the women. The dreamlike eye which seems to absorb us and before which we ourselves appear as phantoms." The inspiration for Malini's voice over is Christa Wolf's novel Cassandra, in which the mythological story is narrated by the prophetic daughter of Priam... "like Cassandra, we have Sahadeva in the Mahabharata. He knew the future but he needed to be asked... Which is what’s going on now. It’s like we’re cursed – we can see, we know what’s going to happen, but we’re frozen."
Covarrubias observed "travellers.. cannot understand why the great crowds sit listening with profound attention to the plays that do not end before dawn.. Every object and every move of the marionettes has symbolic significance.." Malani's shadows are wrested from narrative contextualization to intermingle, similar in manner to Bhanu Kapil's 2011 memoir of Indian partition Schizophrene, initially inspired by Ana Mendiata's silueta works and conceived as an epic until she threw the final drafts into the snow and retrieved them months later "I wanted to think about hallucination: the organization of acute matter. The capacity of fragments to attract, occur, re-circulate or shake (descend): in play." In both works, the imperative of describing the aftermath of partition seems to have demanded their final forms.
William Kentridge, who also utilizes shadow puppetry in videos like this one featuring his Ubu sketches
has a show of videos, sound sculptures and drawings of trees at Marian Goodman til the 26th, plus his "Felix in Exile" is still being projected in the contemporary rotation at MoMA, where at the "Soundings" show Jana Winderen's decontextualizing takes the form of using underwater microphones to gather sounds of creatures in the ultrasound range "above the hearing capacity of humans but in which many mammal and insect species communicate.. sounds made by.. bats, fish, and underwater insects and (pitching) these transmissions down to the human range" then mixing them together. (til Nov 3)
Boatswain Pettibon's offerings at Zwirner (til the 26th) are made up to resemble an early 80s studio with the bo's'n's 2013 prices, like 75K for a work on paper which says "Allowance $55,000," so I suppose you old schoolers who'd go vinyl shopping when the SST catalog came in the snail mail were making sound investments.
Piri' Miri Muli' readers should have no difficulty discerning what has drawn me to MoMA recently, and the Magritte show covering in about a half dozen or so rooms the period between his first Surrealist paintings of 1926 to 1938 is no disappointment, presenting many works from private collections as well as works on paper that one rarely sees even in reproduction. I once took a bus from South Jersey to Montreal to see a Magritte retrospective, sponsored by the Oldsmobile Aurora "Ceci n'est pas une Oldsmobile." The Greyhound ride was as you would guess horrible as we had to get out several times in the middle of the night and I got no sleep while my wingman got one hour, thus being more tired when we went straight to the Louise Bourgeois show at the contemporary museum and so when a crowd of art students sat around the video of Louise in her kitchen "you think my anger is fake?! Really?! Is this fake?! (breaks dishes) Is this fake?! (break more dishes)" he was snoring even louder than the audio. But as most of Magritte's classic themes were introduced in these early years this (til Jan 12) is a joy, also traveling to Houston's Menil and the Art Institute of Chicago...
a focus that documents his thought process during his formative years, like his "The Light of Coincidences" with a candle representing the illumination of Lautreamont's "beautiful as the chance meeting on a dissecting-table of a sewing-machine and an umbrella," using ordinary objects rather than abstractions or imaginary creatures in a saṃsāra equals nirvāṇa approach, in his words: "a woman's body floating above a city was an advantageous substitute for the angels that never presented themselves to my sight." This subject matter and the hard edge composition cited in Magritte (whose lifelong emulation of de Chirico extended to his own Reubens phase) was what prompted Arthur Danto to call Surrealism 'retrograde' - forgetting of course Ernst's influence on everything he feels compelled to like - that I sometimes like to, well, I'll let Breton take this one this time (1937): "Those who speak disparagingly of Magritte's 'imagery' and reproach him for going against the grain of contemporary 'researches' in the plastic arts should beware: they are simply revealing the limits of their own intelligence.. the absolute scrupulousness of the kind of concrete figuration.. preserves the great semantic bridge which allows us to pass from the proper meaning to the figurative meaning and conjugate these two meanings in a single glance, with the aim of achieving 'perfect thought,' that is to say, thought that has achieved complete emancipation."
Malini cites as formative being a Hindu refugee from the partition of India born in Karachi, Pakistan, "Cutting the country on religious lines was terrible in itself, but more terrible because they left behind a tool for further cutting, for the right wing to do whatever they like... And under the guise of communal problems, construction companies join hands with fascists to destroy the slums, in places where everybody was living together in complete harmony. So under any excuse this thing starts up... It’s all part of the business of greed. And it’s not about the Hindu-Muslim conflict."
The tradition of shadow puppetry referenced by Malani is believed by some to date to the city of Harappa in the Pakistani side of the Punjab before the Aryan invasion in the 2nd millennium BC as well as in Bengal during that time, and has for thousands of years been used to enact the Hindu epics of the Mahabharata and Ramayana throughout India, migrating to Hindu communities in Java and Bali in Indonesia where it has retained its intensity. Miguel Covarrubias recounted in the 1930s "in Java it is a rule that the men look at the puppets while the women see only the shadows" around the time when Artaud observed during Balinese dance "the stratified, lunar eyes of the women. The dreamlike eye which seems to absorb us and before which we ourselves appear as phantoms." The inspiration for Malini's voice over is Christa Wolf's novel Cassandra, in which the mythological story is narrated by the prophetic daughter of Priam... "like Cassandra, we have Sahadeva in the Mahabharata. He knew the future but he needed to be asked... Which is what’s going on now. It’s like we’re cursed – we can see, we know what’s going to happen, but we’re frozen."
Covarrubias observed "travellers.. cannot understand why the great crowds sit listening with profound attention to the plays that do not end before dawn.. Every object and every move of the marionettes has symbolic significance.." Malani's shadows are wrested from narrative contextualization to intermingle, similar in manner to Bhanu Kapil's 2011 memoir of Indian partition Schizophrene, initially inspired by Ana Mendiata's silueta works and conceived as an epic until she threw the final drafts into the snow and retrieved them months later "I wanted to think about hallucination: the organization of acute matter. The capacity of fragments to attract, occur, re-circulate or shake (descend): in play." In both works, the imperative of describing the aftermath of partition seems to have demanded their final forms.
William Kentridge, who also utilizes shadow puppetry in videos like this one featuring his Ubu sketches
has a show of videos, sound sculptures and drawings of trees at Marian Goodman til the 26th, plus his "Felix in Exile" is still being projected in the contemporary rotation at MoMA, where at the "Soundings" show Jana Winderen's decontextualizing takes the form of using underwater microphones to gather sounds of creatures in the ultrasound range "above the hearing capacity of humans but in which many mammal and insect species communicate.. sounds made by.. bats, fish, and underwater insects and (pitching) these transmissions down to the human range" then mixing them together. (til Nov 3)
Boatswain Pettibon's offerings at Zwirner (til the 26th) are made up to resemble an early 80s studio with the bo's'n's 2013 prices, like 75K for a work on paper which says "Allowance $55,000," so I suppose you old schoolers who'd go vinyl shopping when the SST catalog came in the snail mail were making sound investments.
Piri' Miri Muli' readers should have no difficulty discerning what has drawn me to MoMA recently, and the Magritte show covering in about a half dozen or so rooms the period between his first Surrealist paintings of 1926 to 1938 is no disappointment, presenting many works from private collections as well as works on paper that one rarely sees even in reproduction. I once took a bus from South Jersey to Montreal to see a Magritte retrospective, sponsored by the Oldsmobile Aurora "Ceci n'est pas une Oldsmobile." The Greyhound ride was as you would guess horrible as we had to get out several times in the middle of the night and I got no sleep while my wingman got one hour, thus being more tired when we went straight to the Louise Bourgeois show at the contemporary museum and so when a crowd of art students sat around the video of Louise in her kitchen "you think my anger is fake?! Really?! Is this fake?! (breaks dishes) Is this fake?! (break more dishes)" he was snoring even louder than the audio. But as most of Magritte's classic themes were introduced in these early years this (til Jan 12) is a joy, also traveling to Houston's Menil and the Art Institute of Chicago...
a focus that documents his thought process during his formative years, like his "The Light of Coincidences" with a candle representing the illumination of Lautreamont's "beautiful as the chance meeting on a dissecting-table of a sewing-machine and an umbrella," using ordinary objects rather than abstractions or imaginary creatures in a saṃsāra equals nirvāṇa approach, in his words: "a woman's body floating above a city was an advantageous substitute for the angels that never presented themselves to my sight." This subject matter and the hard edge composition cited in Magritte (whose lifelong emulation of de Chirico extended to his own Reubens phase) was what prompted Arthur Danto to call Surrealism 'retrograde' - forgetting of course Ernst's influence on everything he feels compelled to like - that I sometimes like to, well, I'll let Breton take this one this time (1937): "Those who speak disparagingly of Magritte's 'imagery' and reproach him for going against the grain of contemporary 'researches' in the plastic arts should beware: they are simply revealing the limits of their own intelligence.. the absolute scrupulousness of the kind of concrete figuration.. preserves the great semantic bridge which allows us to pass from the proper meaning to the figurative meaning and conjugate these two meanings in a single glance, with the aim of achieving 'perfect thought,' that is to say, thought that has achieved complete emancipation."
19 July 2013
25 May 2013
25 February 2013
![]() |
| Gauguin "Mallarme" 1861 |
![]() |
| Robert Motherwell, Mallarme's Swan, 1944 |
Rancière wrote about the sonnet that contrasts the lowercase swan with the capitalized Swan (perhaps the constellation Cygnus) "..the great 'tragedy of nature'; born again with each dawn from the darkness in which it dies each evening. As with nature, this tragedy has had its time, which is that of the first autumn. The poet who does not bear this in mind is like the swan, its captive wing stuck in the ice sheets of winter.. That is the mystery that succeeds tragedy: the great metaphor of the Idea-sun, buried in waters and darkness, is shattered into a multiplicity of schemas of disappearing.." Piri' Miri Muli' can't actually certify that the lowercase swan could get his wing out of the ice by conjuring Mallarmé's vision of the first autumn, as winter weather brought him precarious health '..I shall die or I shall survive.. I am descending earthwards from the Absolute..': Homer noted how Northern European swans sang just before they froze; in milder climes, the Nicaraguan Dario's capital S Swan sings the dawn instead of death at the precise moment it becomes Wagnerian, before the hill-dwelling González Martínez returned to the Mallarméan owl, which would seem to dream of swans all night. Mallarmé's Swan sonnet is used in the first improvisation of Boulez' Fold Upon Fold, a phrase* that Mallarmé used to describe the fog in Bruges:
Badiou uses 'schemas of disappearing' to interpret the "Ses purs ongles très haut…" sonnet in which "the sun-event, that is, the mirror" reveals "unicorns lashing a nymph with a flame" and then "disappears" to "create a sort of.. 'ban' of the subtractive." The poet also disappears, as Mallarmé writes "The right to accomplish anything exceptional, or beyond the reach of the vulgar, is paid for by the omission of the doer, and by his death as so-and-so." Paz calls the first stanza the death of nature, the second the death of consciousness, and the third, the mirage of the unicorn burning the nymph, the erotic. "Midnight.. is anguish.. Anguish is not psychological: it is a phase of the solar rite."
* Deleuze: "The fold is probably Mallarmé's most important notion.. the fold of the world is.. the open fan (which) makes all particles of matter, ashes, and fog rise and fall. We glimpse the visible through the mist as if through the mesh of a veil, following the creases that allow us to see stone in the opening of their inflections.."
12 February 2013
The bull as solar personification figures in a crucial poem of the late 40's by René Char, when he was emerging from his Liberation digs in Céreste, the mountain town 59 km east of his birthplace where he was known as Capitaine Alexandre, and began again to publish his work:
THE BULL
It is never night when you die,
Circled by shrieking shadows,
Sun with two like points.
Beast of love, sword's truth,
Murderous duo unique before all.
tr: James Lawler
Bullfighting was part of Char's everyday life growing up, where, as Ford Madox Ford wrote in 1935 "In Provence.. the bullfight continues still in its triumphant progress at the sword-ends of actors.. its essentials are swiftness and skill in wielding a thin spike of steel against a furious and alert monster.. In every village of Provence there is a bull-ring and on every Sunday of the year when the days are warm enough, all the young men of courage face, without arms, the wild bulls of the Camargue.." René's grandfather, a foundling named Charlemagne, walked to L'Isle-sur-Sorgue, 29 km east of Avignon, becoming a plaster merchant and building up the family business to where his son, Emile, would become mayor and have the square between the town center and the train station named after him, containing one of the town's ten remaining watermills upon the arms of the river Sorgue which powered the silk factories of its industrial boom:
"I was ten. The Sorgue enshrined me. The sun sang the hours upon the wise dial of the waters. Both sorrow and insouciance had sealed the weathercock onto the roof of the houses where, together, they stood propped. What wheel, though, in the heart of a watchful child turns swifter, more powerfully, than that of the mill with its white fire?" ("Announcing One's Name," tr: Gustaf Sobin)
Char's use of the bull as solar personification is without direct reference to the labyrinth myth, which entered France by way of Provence. The Parisian belief of Baudelare and Surrealists that myths had to emanate from the modern gave way to Char's Provençal belief that myths emanated from nature, as his "Orion iroquois" found validation in the Iroquois' ceremony which coincided with the position of the constellation, before Breton, who referenced Oceanic myths late in his life, would use the labyrinth image to compliment Miró's constellations. The author of the line "fauve d'amour/ beast of love" was friends not only with Masson and Picasso, painters of bulls, and Bataille ("THE UNIVERSAL resembles a bull"), but also with Matisse years after his paintings like "Joie de Vivre" had him labeled a Fauvist. Around this time Char and his friends were developing an interest in Lascaux and the neighboring caves, and after Henri Breuil described an animal in the main chamber (right) in his 1952 book as "The Unicorn," Char described it in a poem as "La Bête Inncommable/ The Unnamable Beast." Char was at one time friends with both Breton and Heidegger, entertaining the disparate strands of romanticism.
Piri' Miri Muli' readers recall Paz' commentary on Rilke's Eight Elegy: "The 'open' is where contraries are reconciled, where light and shadow are fused. This conception restores death's original meaning: death and life are opposites that compliment each other. Both are halves of a sphere that we, subjects of time and space, can only glimpse.. This recognition can only take place through detachment: he must renounce his temporal life and his nostalgia for limbo, for the animal world. He must open himself out to death if he wishes to open himself out to life. Then he will be 'like the angels.'" For Antoine Bloyé, the Nantes railroad manager of Paul Nizan's 1933 novel of the same name, "Death was in him.. without images.. without ideas.. not imaginable.. his nothingness would not be represented."
Bataille's essay from the Picasso issue of Documents notes "the human tendency to distinguish two suns": the sun "one obstinately focuses on" and the sun not stared at directly "of mathematical serenity and spiritual elevation." The Icarus myth "splits the sun in two - the one that was shining at the moment of Icarus' elevation, and the one that melted the wax.." Georg Trakl's poem "The Sun" similarly names two suns tied to human perception, "When night comes,/ The wanderer gently lifts the heavy eyelids.." after the daytime sun allows the natural world to "rise.. glide.." and "ripen."
Char as a pre-teen read Baudelaire, Rimbaud and Petrarch, and the title of "Le Soleil des eaux", composed around the same time as "The Bull," may like the watermill's "fire" have recalled Baudelaire's "les soleils marins" phrase from "La Vie antérieure," channeling a previous life when his slaves were assigned the sole task of interpreting the hidden cause of his sorrow, or Rimbaud's "sea gone with the sun." Petrarch lived the next town over in Fontaine-de-Vaucluse, "mostly visited by those who have never heard of the poet whose sylvan haunt it once was, 'happy to have the Muses for his companions and the song of the birds and the murmur of the stream for his serenade.'" Petrarch, seeing the source of the Sorgue there at age 9 "spoke my boyish thoughts to myself: Here is the place which best suits with my temper, and which, if ever I have the chance, I will prefer before great cities." André Thirion in 1972 had "recently reread (Char's) 'Artine': 'Despite animals and cyclones Artine maintained an inexhaustible freshness. When strolling, she was absolute transparency.' Wasn't she coming straight from La Fontaine-de-Vaucluse?"
At 22, around the same time "The Bull" was written, Pierre Boulez would set Char's "Le Soleil des eaux" to music, at first wanting to present his poems a capella, then mixing Webern and Asian music in anticipation of using Char's Surrealist poems for Le marteau sans maître a few years later, which Boulez and Stravinsky agreed was his seminal early work. "The Bull"'s compression is what Boulez noticed: "what attracted me to Char was not, as many have written, his love of nature, his love of Provence, or his deep understanding of men. Rather was it his extraordinary power to gather together, in an extremely concise way, a whole universe." Soleil was originally a long poem documenting the Resistance, but Boulez used only a dramatic monologue of a lizard who fancies himself an omniscient prophet and tragically falls in love with a goldfinch ("who but a lizard in love to tell the secrets of the earth") followed by a tribute to the Sorgue. It could seem, at first, daunting for Char to compose a poem about a river frequently described in Petrarch's Canzionere as in 208 "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak," but Petrarch's much too fixated* on the married Laura of whom "we have no reason to suppose.. ever bestowed one favor on Petrarch beyond a pleasant look.." for him to give the river the extended treatment Char gave it:
Solar imagery would be related to his Resistance experience: In "Freedom" "..it came, a swan on the wound, along this white line.. that might signify dawn's emergence as well as dusk's candlestick", "Penumbra": "I was in one of those forests where the sun has no access, but where stars penetrate by night. The place could exist only because the inquisition of the state had overlooked it.." (tr: Mary Ann Caws)
* Char's aphorism "Le poème est l'amour réalisé du désir demeuré désir" could be commentary on Petrarch's legacy.
THE BULL
It is never night when you die,
Circled by shrieking shadows,
Sun with two like points.
Beast of love, sword's truth,
Murderous duo unique before all.
tr: James Lawler
![]() |
| Francis Picabia, Corrida-Transparence, 1930 |
Bullfighting was part of Char's everyday life growing up, where, as Ford Madox Ford wrote in 1935 "In Provence.. the bullfight continues still in its triumphant progress at the sword-ends of actors.. its essentials are swiftness and skill in wielding a thin spike of steel against a furious and alert monster.. In every village of Provence there is a bull-ring and on every Sunday of the year when the days are warm enough, all the young men of courage face, without arms, the wild bulls of the Camargue.." René's grandfather, a foundling named Charlemagne, walked to L'Isle-sur-Sorgue, 29 km east of Avignon, becoming a plaster merchant and building up the family business to where his son, Emile, would become mayor and have the square between the town center and the train station named after him, containing one of the town's ten remaining watermills upon the arms of the river Sorgue which powered the silk factories of its industrial boom:
"I was ten. The Sorgue enshrined me. The sun sang the hours upon the wise dial of the waters. Both sorrow and insouciance had sealed the weathercock onto the roof of the houses where, together, they stood propped. What wheel, though, in the heart of a watchful child turns swifter, more powerfully, than that of the mill with its white fire?" ("Announcing One's Name," tr: Gustaf Sobin)
Char's use of the bull as solar personification is without direct reference to the labyrinth myth, which entered France by way of Provence. The Parisian belief of Baudelare and Surrealists that myths had to emanate from the modern gave way to Char's Provençal belief that myths emanated from nature, as his "Orion iroquois" found validation in the Iroquois' ceremony which coincided with the position of the constellation, before Breton, who referenced Oceanic myths late in his life, would use the labyrinth image to compliment Miró's constellations. The author of the line "fauve d'amour/ beast of love" was friends not only with Masson and Picasso, painters of bulls, and Bataille ("THE UNIVERSAL resembles a bull"), but also with Matisse years after his paintings like "Joie de Vivre" had him labeled a Fauvist. Around this time Char and his friends were developing an interest in Lascaux and the neighboring caves, and after Henri Breuil described an animal in the main chamber (right) in his 1952 book as "The Unicorn," Char described it in a poem as "La Bête Inncommable/ The Unnamable Beast." Char was at one time friends with both Breton and Heidegger, entertaining the disparate strands of romanticism.
Piri' Miri Muli' readers recall Paz' commentary on Rilke's Eight Elegy: "The 'open' is where contraries are reconciled, where light and shadow are fused. This conception restores death's original meaning: death and life are opposites that compliment each other. Both are halves of a sphere that we, subjects of time and space, can only glimpse.. This recognition can only take place through detachment: he must renounce his temporal life and his nostalgia for limbo, for the animal world. He must open himself out to death if he wishes to open himself out to life. Then he will be 'like the angels.'" For Antoine Bloyé, the Nantes railroad manager of Paul Nizan's 1933 novel of the same name, "Death was in him.. without images.. without ideas.. not imaginable.. his nothingness would not be represented."
Bataille's essay from the Picasso issue of Documents notes "the human tendency to distinguish two suns": the sun "one obstinately focuses on" and the sun not stared at directly "of mathematical serenity and spiritual elevation." The Icarus myth "splits the sun in two - the one that was shining at the moment of Icarus' elevation, and the one that melted the wax.." Georg Trakl's poem "The Sun" similarly names two suns tied to human perception, "When night comes,/ The wanderer gently lifts the heavy eyelids.." after the daytime sun allows the natural world to "rise.. glide.." and "ripen."
Char as a pre-teen read Baudelaire, Rimbaud and Petrarch, and the title of "Le Soleil des eaux", composed around the same time as "The Bull," may like the watermill's "fire" have recalled Baudelaire's "les soleils marins" phrase from "La Vie antérieure," channeling a previous life when his slaves were assigned the sole task of interpreting the hidden cause of his sorrow, or Rimbaud's "sea gone with the sun." Petrarch lived the next town over in Fontaine-de-Vaucluse, "mostly visited by those who have never heard of the poet whose sylvan haunt it once was, 'happy to have the Muses for his companions and the song of the birds and the murmur of the stream for his serenade.'" Petrarch, seeing the source of the Sorgue there at age 9 "spoke my boyish thoughts to myself: Here is the place which best suits with my temper, and which, if ever I have the chance, I will prefer before great cities." André Thirion in 1972 had "recently reread (Char's) 'Artine': 'Despite animals and cyclones Artine maintained an inexhaustible freshness. When strolling, she was absolute transparency.' Wasn't she coming straight from La Fontaine-de-Vaucluse?"
At 22, around the same time "The Bull" was written, Pierre Boulez would set Char's "Le Soleil des eaux" to music, at first wanting to present his poems a capella, then mixing Webern and Asian music in anticipation of using Char's Surrealist poems for Le marteau sans maître a few years later, which Boulez and Stravinsky agreed was his seminal early work. "The Bull"'s compression is what Boulez noticed: "what attracted me to Char was not, as many have written, his love of nature, his love of Provence, or his deep understanding of men. Rather was it his extraordinary power to gather together, in an extremely concise way, a whole universe." Soleil was originally a long poem documenting the Resistance, but Boulez used only a dramatic monologue of a lizard who fancies himself an omniscient prophet and tragically falls in love with a goldfinch ("who but a lizard in love to tell the secrets of the earth") followed by a tribute to the Sorgue. It could seem, at first, daunting for Char to compose a poem about a river frequently described in Petrarch's Canzionere as in 208 "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak," but Petrarch's much too fixated* on the married Laura of whom "we have no reason to suppose.. ever bestowed one favor on Petrarch beyond a pleasant look.." for him to give the river the extended treatment Char gave it:
Solar imagery would be related to his Resistance experience: In "Freedom" "..it came, a swan on the wound, along this white line.. that might signify dawn's emergence as well as dusk's candlestick", "Penumbra": "I was in one of those forests where the sun has no access, but where stars penetrate by night. The place could exist only because the inquisition of the state had overlooked it.." (tr: Mary Ann Caws)
* Char's aphorism "Le poème est l'amour réalisé du désir demeuré désir" could be commentary on Petrarch's legacy.
![]() |
| Anselm Kiefer, Fur René |
02 February 2013
The key to Badiou's "I'll train those two!" line in Film Socialisme may lie in his description of Brechtian didacticism in the opening essay of his 1998 Petit manuel d'inesthetique, which also contains an essay on cinema: "The thesis (of the didactic schema) is that art is incapable of truth, or that all truth is external to art.. The definition of art, and of art alone: To be the charm of the semblance of truth...
"For (the didactic) Brecht, there exists a general and extrinsic truth, a truth the character of which is scientific.. dialectical materialism, whose status as the solid base of the new rationality Brecht never cast into doubt. This truth is essentially philosophical, and the 'philosopher' is the leading character in Brecht's didactic dialogues..
"For Brecht, art produces no truth, but is instead an elucidation - based on the supposition that the true exists - of the conditions for a courage of truth. Art, under surveillance, is a therapy against cowardice. Not against cowardice in general, but against cowardice in the face of truth. This is obviously why the figure of Galileo is central.."
The other two schemata are romanticism, which Badiou equates with Heideggerian hermeneutics, and psychoanalysis, aligned with the classicist, Aristotelian emotional catharsis in contrast to Brecht's Platonism. He complains that the avant-gardes couldn't unite the first two against the third, citing Marinetti and Breton, in the long tradition of convoluted logic by Frenchmen to complain about Breton's aesthetics which includes, vying with Camus for the most deceptive tract, that of Henri Lefebvre's in Critique of Everyday Life. Lefebvre, to his credit, said in a 1955 lecture on Lukács "the subversive antibourgeous character of Romanticism acts as a screen between classicism and ourselves. For my part, I do not share Lukács' radical suspicion of Romanticism," pointing out, as would countless other examples and testimonies, that there are many more sides to Romanticism other than Badiou's definition, which is no doubt a strain within the tradition. Breton called Surrealism "the prehensile tail of romanticism." Anna Balakian wrote "Breton notes.. that.. Hegel succeeded in pointing out the very true differences between romanticism and modernism: the romantic draws the object within itself and makes an abstraction of it, while the true modern projects himself into the concrete existence of the object." To gauge amongst other things, the treatment of the Aristotelian in Aragon's Le Paysan de Paris and Breton's Nadja, "the measuring stick is knowledge of concrete forms and objects, and the mind's elasticity in transforming them." Breton sought out Freud in person and Aragon would emerge as a conventional master of Aristotelian-structured novels after WW2. We find below Godard, too, succumbing to the non-Brechtian "Oh! how many imagine the Bérénice, the Phèdre of their dreams, leaving the trace of her tears on her screen." (below, spoon purchased in L'Amour Fou by Breton at Saint-Ouen Market in the presence of Giacometti)
Brecht's first play, Baal* (noted here in keeping with the Minotaur theme, I, II) commented on the Romanticism that animated the previous era's fashion for Expressionism, which Douglas Kellner thinks "we must see.. as a late development of romantic anti-capitalist revolts."
Bentley: "Walter Sokol has written of (Baal) eloquently as a parody of those Expressionist heroes whose life was a sacred mission. But since Brecht considered the Expressionist missions spurious, he makes Baal's 'mission' genuine. Baal is an ambiguous, ambivalent figure: part monster, but partly, too, the martyr of a poetic hedonism. And the positive element is more prominent than the negative because it is Baal's special contribution - his monstrousness he has in common with a monstrous world."
As the "didacticism" Badiou attributes to Brecht wasn't fully formed, the Hitchcockian justice visited on Baal's chaos and destruction is in keeping with Aristotelian conflict: "With the early Brecht, it is as if he were striving to break through to a hedonism as radical as that of Herbert Marcuse and Norman O. Brown. That guilt and anxiety blocked his path may, in one respect have been fortunate: he was a dramatist - conflict was his raw material."
The differing uses of the Baal/ Moloch figure by Brecht and Allen Ginsberg indicate their respective orientations at their starting points. Ginsberg's was "Moloch whose love is endless oil and stone! Moloch whose soul is electricity and banks!," returning to William Blake who "had attacked the 'Satanic mills' and called for a spiritual rebirth in the face of the material and spiritual decay which industrialization produced." America in the 50's produced "the incomprehensible prison.. Moloch the crossbone soulless jailhouse and Congress of sorrows," against which Ginsberg and his poet friends were protagonists slaying "Moloch who entered my soul early!" Brecht had a picture of Baal over his bed in Augsburg, "the enemy of the Christian-Judaic, puritanic, ascetic tradition.. an enemy of 'all that lacks life and vitality'.. of death." Prefacing his 1926 rewrite, he noted Baal's "heedless way of living.." and that "he shamelessly exploited every possibility that offered." Blake, believed to have been unaware of Hegel, wrote in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell "Without Contraries is no progression" and "Good is the passive that obeys Reason. Evil is the active springing from Energy," long before Bentley would attribute that view to Brecht.
* 1982 BBC version starring Bowie in the title role here.
"For (the didactic) Brecht, there exists a general and extrinsic truth, a truth the character of which is scientific.. dialectical materialism, whose status as the solid base of the new rationality Brecht never cast into doubt. This truth is essentially philosophical, and the 'philosopher' is the leading character in Brecht's didactic dialogues..
"For Brecht, art produces no truth, but is instead an elucidation - based on the supposition that the true exists - of the conditions for a courage of truth. Art, under surveillance, is a therapy against cowardice. Not against cowardice in general, but against cowardice in the face of truth. This is obviously why the figure of Galileo is central.."
The other two schemata are romanticism, which Badiou equates with Heideggerian hermeneutics, and psychoanalysis, aligned with the classicist, Aristotelian emotional catharsis in contrast to Brecht's Platonism. He complains that the avant-gardes couldn't unite the first two against the third, citing Marinetti and Breton, in the long tradition of convoluted logic by Frenchmen to complain about Breton's aesthetics which includes, vying with Camus for the most deceptive tract, that of Henri Lefebvre's in Critique of Everyday Life. Lefebvre, to his credit, said in a 1955 lecture on Lukács "the subversive antibourgeous character of Romanticism acts as a screen between classicism and ourselves. For my part, I do not share Lukács' radical suspicion of Romanticism," pointing out, as would countless other examples and testimonies, that there are many more sides to Romanticism other than Badiou's definition, which is no doubt a strain within the tradition. Breton called Surrealism "the prehensile tail of romanticism." Anna Balakian wrote "Breton notes.. that.. Hegel succeeded in pointing out the very true differences between romanticism and modernism: the romantic draws the object within itself and makes an abstraction of it, while the true modern projects himself into the concrete existence of the object." To gauge amongst other things, the treatment of the Aristotelian in Aragon's Le Paysan de Paris and Breton's Nadja, "the measuring stick is knowledge of concrete forms and objects, and the mind's elasticity in transforming them." Breton sought out Freud in person and Aragon would emerge as a conventional master of Aristotelian-structured novels after WW2. We find below Godard, too, succumbing to the non-Brechtian "Oh! how many imagine the Bérénice, the Phèdre of their dreams, leaving the trace of her tears on her screen." (below, spoon purchased in L'Amour Fou by Breton at Saint-Ouen Market in the presence of Giacometti)
Brecht's first play, Baal* (noted here in keeping with the Minotaur theme, I, II) commented on the Romanticism that animated the previous era's fashion for Expressionism, which Douglas Kellner thinks "we must see.. as a late development of romantic anti-capitalist revolts."
Bentley: "Walter Sokol has written of (Baal) eloquently as a parody of those Expressionist heroes whose life was a sacred mission. But since Brecht considered the Expressionist missions spurious, he makes Baal's 'mission' genuine. Baal is an ambiguous, ambivalent figure: part monster, but partly, too, the martyr of a poetic hedonism. And the positive element is more prominent than the negative because it is Baal's special contribution - his monstrousness he has in common with a monstrous world."
As the "didacticism" Badiou attributes to Brecht wasn't fully formed, the Hitchcockian justice visited on Baal's chaos and destruction is in keeping with Aristotelian conflict: "With the early Brecht, it is as if he were striving to break through to a hedonism as radical as that of Herbert Marcuse and Norman O. Brown. That guilt and anxiety blocked his path may, in one respect have been fortunate: he was a dramatist - conflict was his raw material."
The differing uses of the Baal/ Moloch figure by Brecht and Allen Ginsberg indicate their respective orientations at their starting points. Ginsberg's was "Moloch whose love is endless oil and stone! Moloch whose soul is electricity and banks!," returning to William Blake who "had attacked the 'Satanic mills' and called for a spiritual rebirth in the face of the material and spiritual decay which industrialization produced." America in the 50's produced "the incomprehensible prison.. Moloch the crossbone soulless jailhouse and Congress of sorrows," against which Ginsberg and his poet friends were protagonists slaying "Moloch who entered my soul early!" Brecht had a picture of Baal over his bed in Augsburg, "the enemy of the Christian-Judaic, puritanic, ascetic tradition.. an enemy of 'all that lacks life and vitality'.. of death." Prefacing his 1926 rewrite, he noted Baal's "heedless way of living.." and that "he shamelessly exploited every possibility that offered." Blake, believed to have been unaware of Hegel, wrote in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell "Without Contraries is no progression" and "Good is the passive that obeys Reason. Evil is the active springing from Energy," long before Bentley would attribute that view to Brecht.
* 1982 BBC version starring Bowie in the title role here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
+-+Rene+Magritte.jpg)


.jpg)








